| Mirage Source http://web.miragesource.net/forums/ |
|
| MS.NET: VB.NET or C# http://web.miragesource.net/forums/viewtopic.php?f=193&t=5599 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | Jacob [ Fri May 15, 2009 1:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | MS.NET: VB.NET or C# |
Exadon and I are talking about MS.NET. We are trying to figure out the best course of action. We both know C# and a very small amount of VB.NET. The advantages of VB.NET are that most using the current MS would be a bit more familiar with the new syntax of VB.Net as opposed to learning C#. This time I'm not just converting the source, it will be a full rewrite with current coding standards. We will be fully commenting and documenting the code. |
|
| Author: | Exadon [ Fri May 15, 2009 1:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MS.NET: VB.NET or C# |
My vote is for C#...why you ask? Because I will be coding part of the damn thing! I know C# better than I know VB.net. I am fine with either or though...but you should vote C# oh and yes we will be documenting...and commenting...and more documenting...and than some more comments on the comments and documentation. A lot of work...but in the end will be worth it. |
|
| Author: | Jared [ Fri May 15, 2009 2:24 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MS.NET: VB.NET or C# |
I Vote C#. |
|
| Author: | Jack [ Fri May 15, 2009 2:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MS.NET: VB.NET or C# |
ill help if its in C# im learning it now and im pritty good at it if i do say so my self. |
|
| Author: | Rian [ Fri May 15, 2009 4:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MS.NET: VB.NET or C# |
I also vote c#. Though, I'd love to see a MS4.Net as well. |
|
| Author: | Jack [ Fri May 15, 2009 4:43 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MS.NET: VB.NET or C# |
I can could try convert to C# later on in the year. |
|
| Author: | Beres [ Fri May 15, 2009 4:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MS.NET: VB.NET or C# |
either one is awesome.. if its c# then it will give me a reason to learn c#. |
|
| Author: | Jack [ Fri May 15, 2009 5:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MS.NET: VB.NET or C# |
I wouldn't learn a language you just want to learn so you can try code something, i would learn a language that your really want to learn, and if you like it. There is no point in learning the language if it isn't your thing =). |
|
| Author: | Rian [ Fri May 15, 2009 7:32 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MS.NET: VB.NET or C# |
Personally, I can't learn from a book. I've tried learning C#, didn't happen. I'll pick it up if Mirage gets converted. Basically what I'm saying is that just because Beres and I are taking the approach you described doesn't mean that we Code: I wouldn't learn a language you just want to learn so you can try code something As you sort of redundantly put it |
|
| Author: | Jack [ Fri May 15, 2009 7:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MS.NET: VB.NET or C# |
Lol. Ok but that was my opinion of learning a code, and btw in use quote not code ;D |
|
| Author: | GIAKEN [ Fri May 15, 2009 8:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MS.NET: VB.NET or C# |
Umm...did Jack just try to correct an oldbie? |
|
| Author: | Rian [ Fri May 15, 2009 8:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MS.NET: VB.NET or C# |
I realized that I inserted your text as code instead of a quote. I didn't change it because I didn't give a shit, and didn't expect anyone else would either. |
|
| Author: | Tony [ Fri May 15, 2009 8:43 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MS.NET: VB.NET or C# |
Yes. Don't embarrass yourself anymore, Jack. |
|
| Author: | Matt [ Fri May 15, 2009 8:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MS.NET: VB.NET or C# |
It's not MS if it's not a conversion. |
|
| Author: | Aydan [ Fri May 15, 2009 10:08 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MS.NET: VB.NET or C# |
I'm a programming failure but I say C# since it's multi platform and will never become outdated wheras in the future .net will probably become obsolete just like vb6 did. gives me an excuse to get off my ass and try learning too. |
|
| Author: | Nean [ Fri May 15, 2009 10:11 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MS.NET: VB.NET or C# |
C# |
|
| Author: | Beres [ Fri May 15, 2009 11:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MS.NET: VB.NET or C# |
Rian wrote: Personally, I can't learn from a book. I've tried learning C#, didn't happen. I'll pick it up if Mirage gets converted. Basically what I'm saying is that just because Beres and I are taking the approach you described doesn't mean that we Code: I wouldn't learn a language you just want to learn so you can try code something As you sort of redundantly put it That's how it is with me. Books don't help. I learned VB6 from mirage like 3-4 years ago. So if it gets done in C#, I have the opportunity to learn. Im not learning the language just so I can program with the engine, I've always wanted to learn C# and VB.NET, so either one I don't really care what its programmed in. |
|
| Author: | ExoShox [ Sat May 16, 2009 12:30 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MS.NET: VB.NET or C# |
i already plan on learning C, C# and C++. I want to learn this stuff but honestly, if i dont have an incentive, itll take me much longer. the reason im learning VB6 so quickly is because i had an incentive. MS was coded in VB6 and XtremeWorlds scripting was SadScript. It gave me an incentive to learn it because its something i needed to do what i did. i vote MS #. MS .NET is not going to help me learn a multi platform language. |
|
| Author: | Dragoons Master [ Sat May 16, 2009 5:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MS.NET: VB.NET or C# |
Aydan wrote: I'm a programming failure but I say C# since it's multi platform and will never become outdated wheras in the future .net will probably become obsolete just like vb6 did. gives me an excuse to get off my ass and try learning too. Just to formalize things here: C# AND VB.Net are BOTH ".Net". ".Net" is a framework. We just don't say "C#.Net". VB.Net is just the same chit as C# when compiled. It's all CIL. |
|
| Author: | GIAKEN [ Sat May 16, 2009 10:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MS.NET: VB.NET or C# |
I vote either Whitespace or Brainfuck. |
|
| Author: | James [ Sat May 16, 2009 10:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MS.NET: VB.NET or C# |
C# please. |
|
| Author: | Matt [ Sun May 17, 2009 2:32 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MS.NET: VB.NET or C# |
As easy as it is to convert C# to VB.Net, why not do BOTH? |
|
| Author: | Coke [ Sun May 17, 2009 7:51 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MS.NET: VB.NET or C# |
C# will FORCE people to learn a language that matters, so C# all the way. |
|
| Author: | unknown [ Sun May 17, 2009 8:02 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MS.NET: VB.NET or C# |
C# is much better... the syntax is cleaner and you can use XNA with C# but not vb.net (meaning if someone is ambitious enough, mirage could run on an xbox 360) All and all it doesn't really matter which language you choose because it's incredibly easy to convert from one to the other and they both run on the .net framework. |
|
| Author: | Aydan [ Mon May 18, 2009 10:31 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MS.NET: VB.NET or C# |
Dragoons Master wrote: Aydan wrote: I'm a programming failure but I say C# since it's multi platform and will never become outdated wheras in the future .net will probably become obsolete just like vb6 did. gives me an excuse to get off my ass and try learning too. Just to formalize things here: C# AND VB.Net are BOTH ".Net". ".Net" is a framework. We just don't say "C#.Net". VB.Net is just the same chit as C# when compiled. It's all CIL. Aha. Well, I feel stupid but only shows im a programming failure What's the deal with C++ then? Is that it's own format or is that based off some kinda framework too? |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|